Claimant v National Crime Agency — 2025

Case reference: 2302134/2024
Decision date: 18 June 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Martin Date

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

National Crime Agency

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal recorded that Mr Perry withdrew his claims of unfair dismissal and discrimination by email dated 18 June 2025. Following that withdrawal, those claims were dismissed.

The judgment expressly states that other claims are not affected by this judgment. No remedy or monetary award is addressed in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment records that the Claimant withdrew his claim of unfair dismissal by email dated 18 June 2025, and that this claim was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Age discrimination	The judgment records withdrawal of a discrimination claim by email dated 18 June 2025 and dismissal of that claim. The PDF text does not itself specify the protected characteristic; age is taken from the gov.uk listing category provided in the case context.	Dismissed	Age	—
Sex discrimination	The judgment records withdrawal of a discrimination claim by email dated 18 June 2025 and dismissal of that claim. The PDF text does not itself specify the protected characteristic; sex is taken from the gov.uk listing category provided in the case context.	Dismissed	Sex	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.