Case 2302141/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Frew, counsel v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302141/2020
- Decision date
- 6 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Frew, counsel
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the name of the first respondent to Equiniti Services Limited. It then dismissed the claims against the second and third respondents by consent. No merits findings were made against those respondents in the judgment.
The remaining claims did not proceed to substantive determination. The claim for "other payments" was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The unfair constructive dismissal claim was also dismissed by consent on withdrawal, with the judgment recording that the parties had reached terms of settlement.
No monetary award was made and the judgment does not set out any split of remedy between claims. The decision is therefore confined to procedural disposal of the claims rather than findings on liability.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim for "other payments" was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair constructive dismissal claim was dismissed by consent on withdrawal by the claimant, and notes that the parties had reached terms of settlement. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.