Case 2302147/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302147/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
- Venue
- London South
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing on 29 October 2019, and Employment Judge Hyams-Parish proceeded in her absence. The respondent was represented by Mr Crawford, Counsel. The judgment records that the claimant's claims were unlawful deduction from wages in relation to commission payments and breach of contract in relation to notice pay.
The tribunal held that both claims were not well founded and dismissed them. No separate findings, liability analysis, or monetary award are recorded in the written judgment beyond that dismissal. The notes state that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerned commission payments. The tribunal held the claim was not well founded and dismissed it after proceeding in the claimant's absence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim concerned notice pay. The tribunal held the claim was not well founded and dismissed it after proceeding in the claimant's absence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.