Case 2302148/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Barba v Burgess Hodgson — 2018
- Case reference
- 2302148/2016
- Decision date
- 18 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Barba
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings brought by Ms S Barba against Burgess Hodgson were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The decision is signed by Employment Judge Sage and dated 18 April 2018.
No findings on liability, remedy, or the substance of the claims are stated in the judgment. The short record does not identify any monetary award, legal test, or lay panel members.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the case listing context because the short judgment does not set out individual pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the case listing context because the short judgment does not set out individual pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the case listing context because the short judgment does not set out individual pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.