Case 2302155/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Howden Joinery Group plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302155/2021
- Decision date
- 14 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records claims by Mr Anthony Braithwaite, Ms Deloris Pryce and Ms Simone Kahan-Howell against Howden Joinery Limited. At a video hearing at Croydon on 14 September 2022, Employment Judge Fowell dismissed specified complaints on withdrawal.
Mr Braithwaite's complaints of disability discrimination and unlawful deduction from wages were dismissed on withdrawal. Ms Pryce's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was dismissed on withdrawal. Ms Kahan-Howell's complaints of age discrimination, sex discrimination and race discrimination were dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment does not record any monetary remedy for the withdrawn complaints. It states that the remaining claims would proceed to a hearing on 20 November 2020, but the extracted judgment does not identify those remaining claims or determine their outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The first claimant's complaint of disability discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The first claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The second claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The third claimant's complaint of age discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | The third claimant's complaint of sex discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The third claimant's complaint of race discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.