Case 2302155/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Grzegorz Ponisz v Rhokett Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302155/2022
- Decision date
- 24 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Krepski Representation
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Grzegorz Ponisz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Grzegorz Ponisz, brought complaints against Rhokett Limited for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal (notice pay). The case was heard at London South via CVP on 23-24 February 2023 before Employment Judge Krepski.
The tribunal dismissed both claims. It found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded, and it also found that the complaint of wrongful dismissal (notice pay) was not well founded.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held that the complaint of wrongful dismissal (notice pay) was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.