Grzegorz Ponisz v Rhokett Limited — 2023

Case reference: 2302155/2022
Decision date: 24 February 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Krepski Representation
Venue: London South via CVP

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Grzegorz Ponisz

Respondent

Rhokett Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant, Grzegorz Ponisz, brought complaints against Rhokett Limited for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal (notice pay). The case was heard at London South via CVP on 23-24 February 2023 before Employment Judge Krepski.

The tribunal dismissed both claims. It found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded, and it also found that the complaint of wrongful dismissal (notice pay) was not well founded.

The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment extract.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded.	Dismissed	—	—
Wrongful dismissal	The tribunal held that the complaint of wrongful dismissal (notice pay) was not well founded.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.