Case 2302157/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C McRobbie v Enghouse Interactive UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302157/2020
- Decision date
- 18 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Braganza Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C McRobbie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs McRobbie brought a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages arising from the Respondent's failure to pay her contractual MBO bonus of £1,588 for the October to December 2019 quarter. The Tribunal noted that the Respondent did not appear at the CVP hearing, and it proceeded in its absence after being satisfied that notice had been given.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant had been employed from 1 July 2010, that her employment transferred from Eptica UK Ltd to the Respondent in around October 2019, and that her contract included a salary plus a performance-related bonus. It accepted that she completed all of her tasks and that the 2019 Target Agreement, signed by the Claimant and her manager on 9 January 2020, confirmed 100% achievement for the relevant quarter.
The Tribunal found that the bonus fell due on 31 January 2020 but was not included in the Claimant's final pay. A letter from the Respondent's HR manager dated 12 February 2020 confirmed that the bonus would be paid on 26 February 2020, but no payment was made and the sum remained outstanding. Applying the statutory provisions on unauthorised deductions from wages and deciding disputed facts on the balance of probabilities, the Tribunal held that the £1,588 bonus was properly payable by the Respondent and ordered it to pay that gross sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was limited at the hearing to the unpaid MBO bonus of £1,588; notice pay was no longer pursued. The Respondent did not attend the hearing. | Upheld | — | £1,588 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,588
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Sections 13 to 27B ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.27 ERA 1996
- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.