Case 2302163/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Cardno v Drainline Southern Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302163/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Cardno
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Croydon on 25 November 2019, Employment Judge Wright heard Mr J Cardno's claim against Drainline Southern Ltd. The judgment recorded that, under regulation 4 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, liability for any outstanding payments fell to the transferee rather than the transferor.
On that basis, the claimant's claim against this respondent failed and was dismissed. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no fuller written reasons were provided in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment states that under regulation 4 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, liability for any outstanding payments falls to the transferee, not the transferor, so the claim against this respondent failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 4 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.