Case 2302176/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Matilda Coker v Ministry of Defence — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302176/2023
- Decision date
- 15 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Matilda Coker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim in its entirety under Rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The respondent's application for a costs order under Rule 76 succeeded. The claimant was ordered to pay the respondent GBP 2,200 in costs.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out in its entirety. The gov.uk listing category identifies Race Discrimination, but the short judgment does not set out the pleaded particulars. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim is struck out in its entirety. The gov.uk listing category identifies Unfair Dismissal, but the short judgment does not set out the pleaded particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 76 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.