Case 2302179/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Longman v SAS Global Communications Limited OPEN PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302179/2022
- Decision date
- 25 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott KC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Longman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter was heard as an open preliminary hearing at London South by CVP on 25 January 2023 before Employment Judge Truscott KC, with Mr S Longman appearing in person and SAS Global Communications Limited represented by Mr G Hollebon, solicitor. The claimant applied to add a second respondent and to amend his pleadings to include a claim based on the application of the TUPE Regulations. The tribunal refused that application.
The written record records only the refusal. It also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party at the hearing or by written request within 14 days of the sending of the decision record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend the pleadings to include a claim based on the application of the TUPE Regulations; no substantive TUPE merits decision was made. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.