Case 2302183/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alexander Akinjayeju v Capita Business Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302183/2020
- Decision date
- 28 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rahman
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mr Anderson, Mr Rogers
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alexander Akinjayeju
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting with members, gave a unanimous judgment on the claimant's disability discrimination claims against Capita Business Services Ltd.
The claim for discrimination arising out of disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. The claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments under section 20 of the Equality Act 2010 was also found not well founded and dismissed.
The judgment text provided records the outcomes but does not set out detailed factual findings, reasoning, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for discrimination arising out of disability contrary to section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments contrary to section 20 of the Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 15 of the Equality Act 2010
- section 20 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.