Case 2302184/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Eleven (UK) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302184/2019
- Decision date
- 4 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard on 4 October 2019 at London South Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Hyams-Parish sitting alone. The claimant, Mr J Klemenz, appeared in person. The respondent, Eleven (UK) Ltd, did not appear and submitted no response. The written record states that the tribunal gave judgment orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for a statutory redundancy payment and unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay £7,843 gross, made up of a statutory redundancy payment of £3,675, holiday pay of £1,373, and notice pay of £2,795. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any tax and national insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment ordered by the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £3,675 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award included holiday pay (£1,373) and notice pay (£2,795) within the tribunal's gross sum for unlawful deductions from wages; the written record does not split those components further. | Upheld | — | £4,168 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,843
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.