Case 2302187/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Ghezali v Hayes Street Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302187/2024
- Decision date
- 8 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Ghezali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 22 February 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £824.96 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, calculated as 3.73 days at £72.94 per day, giving £272.30 gross. The judgment additionally records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant minimum wage.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,097.26 in total, with the claimant to account to HMRC for any sums owed on payments received pursuant to the judgment. The hearing listed for 4 December 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 default judgment. Tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages; £824.96 gross awarded. | Upheld | — | £825 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday entitlement unpaid; calculated as 3.73 days x £72.94 per day = £272.30 gross. | Upheld | — | £272 |
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay claim falls under the Working Time Regulations; recorded separately to mirror the gov.uk listing categories, though the monetary remedy is captured under the holiday_pay claim to avoid double counting. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant the minimum wage (paragraph 4). No discrete monetary figure is attributed to this finding in the judgment; the bottom-line total of £1,097.26 covers the wages and holiday pay components. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,097
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.