Case 2302194/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Eric Kusi v Zenith Textiles Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302194/2022
- Decision date
- 28 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hamour
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Eric Kusi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Eric Kusi confirmed at the hearing on 28 November 2022 that his unfair dismissal claim had already been dismissed on withdrawal on 28 September 2022, and that the only remaining claim pursued was unlawful deduction from wages.
Employment Judge Hamour, sitting alone, found that the unlawful deduction from wages claim was well-founded and succeeded. The judgment does not set out written reasons, and it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
As a remedy, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant such sum as, after any tax deductions the respondent was required to make, would leave the claimant with £350.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the unlawful deduction from wages claim well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay such sum as, subject to any tax deductions the respondent was due to make, would leave the claimant with £350. | Upheld | — | £350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £350
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.