Case 2302204/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F.Ejaz v Pan Haus Leisure Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302204/2023
- Decision date
- 15 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F.Ejaz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 15 January 2024 at London South via CVP before Employment Judge T.R. Smith, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent. The tribunal applied rule 47 and determined the claim on the papers before it.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It declared accordingly and found that the respondent had made deductions from the claimant's wages in the amount identified in the judgment.
The respondent was ordered forthwith to pay the claimant £4,523.08, described in the judgment as the gross sum deducted and calculated as 6 weeks' pay less 2.5 days overpaid holidays. The tribunal recorded that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted, described as 6 weeks' pay less 2.5 days overpaid holidays. | Upheld | — | £4,523 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,523
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.