Case 2302205/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Miss K Reece, Legal Advocate — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302205/2018
- Decision date
- 7 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton Date
- Panel members
- Ms R Bailey, Ms Y Batchelor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in London South before Employment Judge Britton, with Ms R Bailey and Ms Y Batchelor as members, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim of discrimination by reason of pregnancy, including harassment and victimisation, succeeded. The judgment records a total compensation award of £22,231.02 and states that liability and remedy were joint and several as between the respondents.
The age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal, and the claim for constructive unfair dismissal was also dismissed upon withdrawal. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, and the claimant indicated that she did not wish the reasons to be published.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records that the claim of discrimination by reason of pregnancy, including harassment and victimisation, succeeded. The respondents were ordered to pay compensation in the total sum of £22,231.02 on a joint and several basis. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £22,231 |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for constructive unfair dismissal and states that it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,231
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.