Case 2302205/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N C Souza Da Silva Lambley v Department for Work and Pensions — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302205/2022
- Decision date
- 15 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beale
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N C Souza Da Silva Lambley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 27 September 2022 giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. The reason identified was that the claimant did not have the required two years of service to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
The claimant did not make sufficient representations and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining disability discrimination claim remained listed for hearing on 10 August 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out because the claimant did not have the required two years of service and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to do so. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.