Case 2302210/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Girjob v Tailored Franchises Ltd T/A A Suit That Fits — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302210/2019
- Decision date
- 11 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Girjob
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined under Rule 21 that the claimant’s claims of unlawful deductions from wages and constructive dismissal succeeded against Tailored Franchises Ltd T/A A Suit That Fits. The written record states that the claims succeeded and records the decision as having been given orally at the hearing, with no written reasons provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £8,525.93 in compensation. The judgment breaks that figure down as £4,861.14 for constructive dismissal and £3,664.79 for unlawful deduction from wages. It also records that the claimant is responsible for any tax and national insurance due on the sum, if any.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,665 |
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,861 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,526
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £8,526
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.