Case 2302212/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sharlin Patel v Sharchem Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2302212/2022
- Decision date
- 4 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Musgrave-Cohen
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms C Lloyd-Jennings, Mr T Harrington-Roberts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Sharlin Patel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claims. Instead, it recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between Miss Sharlin Patel and Sharchem Limited at the hearing on 3 March 2025 before Employment Judge Musgrave-Cohen, Ms C Lloyd-Jennings and Mr T Harrington-Roberts.
The order stayed the proceedings until 4pm on 21 March 2025 to allow the settlement to be implemented. It also provided that, unless either party applied for the matter to be relisted during the stay, the claim would be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant at the expiry of that period.
No liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment, and no legal test was applied because the case was disposed of by settlement rather than by determination of the substantive issues.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties. It stays the case until 4pm on 21 March 2025 for implementation of the settlement, and states that the claim will be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant at the expiry of the stay unless either party applies for relisting. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.