Case 2302217/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Johnson v Department of Work and Pensions — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302217/2017
- Decision date
- 26 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham QC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal extended time for bringing the unfair dismissal claim by 2 days to 17 November 2017, on the basis that it was not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to bring that claim in time.
The tribunal also ordered consolidation of claim no. 2302217/2017 with the related claim. The written judgment records no determination of the substantive unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, breach of contract, or unlawful deduction from wages complaints, and no remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only that time for bringing the unfair dismissal claim was extended by 2 days because it was not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to bring the claim in time. It does not determine the substantive unfair dismissal complaint. | Other | — | — |
| Other | The judgment consolidates claim no. 2302217/2017 with the related claim, but does not adjudicate the substantive claims within 2302217/2017. The extracted text inconsistently refers to claim numbers 2501536/2017 and 2301536/2017. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.