Case 2302221/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Coleman v Home Contract Care Agency Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302221/2022
- Decision date
- 11 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Armstrong Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Coleman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 6 October 2023 before Employment Judge Armstrong, the tribunal dealt with the respondent's claim for breach of contract in case 2302221/2022. The hearing was conducted by video at London South Employment Tribunal.
The tribunal struck out the respondent's breach of contract claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(c) because the respondent had not complied with a tribunal order. It also struck the claim out under Rule 37(1)(a) on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the respondent's breach of contract claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with a tribunal order and under Rule 37(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(c)
- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.