Case 2302225/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302225/2024
- Decision date
- 24 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tueje BETWEEN
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Tueje, sitting at London South by CVP on 8 and 9 July 2024, found that the Claimant Samuel Fuszard was unfairly dismissed by the Respondent JDE Driver Hire Limited by reason of redundancy. The Respondent was ordered to pay compensation totalling £17,348.85.
The award comprised a compensatory award for past loss of earnings agreed at £5,845.28, a compensatory award for future loss of earnings assessed at £9,926.40, and a 10% uplift of £1,577.17 imposed under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The Tribunal made no order for a basic award because the parties agreed that the Respondent had already paid the Claimant £2,572.00 on 29 February 2024 in respect of a basic award.
The complaint for unpaid holiday was dismissed. The Claimant confirmed there was no complaint of wrongful dismissal before the Tribunal. The extracted judgment text does not set out the underlying reasoning for the unfair dismissal finding or the basis for the 10% uplift.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Tribunal found the Claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy. Compensation comprises past loss of earnings (£5,845.28, agreed), future loss of earnings (£9,926.40), and a 10% s.207A TULR(C)A 1992 uplift (£1,577.17). No basic award was ordered because the parties agreed the Respondent had already paid £2,572.00 on 29 February 2024 in respect of a basic award. | Upheld | — | £17,349 |
| Redundancy | The gov.uk listing flagged redundancy_pay, but the judgment makes no separate order for a basic/redundancy payment because the parties agreed the Respondent had already paid £2,572.00 on 29 February 2024. Recorded as 'other' as the tribunal did not adjudicate this as a freestanding claim. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Paragraph 4 of the judgment: 'The complaint for unpaid holiday is dismissed.' No reasons given in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,349
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £15,772
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.