Case 2302226/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. H Geohagen v Abellio London Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302226/2020
- Decision date
- 10 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. H Geohagen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. The reason given was that the claim had been brought out of time.
The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 12 August 2021 giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claim is struck out because it was brought out of time; the specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category and is not described in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states only that the claim is struck out because it was brought out of time; the specific discrimination claim is taken from the gov.uk listing category and is not described in the judgment text. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that the claim is struck out because it was brought out of time; the specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category and is not described in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.