Case 2302234/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E Ankama (deceased) v Tindacol Limited t/a Edwards & Taylor Chemist — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302234/2022
- Decision date
- 6 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E Ankama (deceased)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal’s single-page judgment records that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No reasons on liability were given, and the judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying facts or legal issues.
No monetary award was made. The judgment contains no separate remedy assessment, no apportionment, and no indication of any findings beyond the procedural disposal of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states: 'the claim is dismissed upon withdrawal.' No substantive liability findings are recorded. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.