Case 2302240/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. U. Kawula v The House of Yoga (London) Limited (in liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302240/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Chudleigh
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. U. Kawula
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs U. Kawula presented claims on 5 and 6 July 2022. After the respondent entered compulsory liquidation on 25 October 2023, the matter was relisted for hearing on 21 March 2024. The tribunal had issued an unless order requiring English medical evidence explaining the claimant's earlier non-attendance; the claimant supplied a translated medical certificate, which the judge found unsatisfactory because it did not state a diagnosis or say she was unfit to attend, but it was sufficient to avoid automatic strike out.
On the morning of the relisted hearing the claimant emailed to seek a postponement because her mother had been taken by ambulance to hospital the previous day. The judge refused the adjournment, relying on the overriding objective and the Presidential Guidance on seeking postponements of hearings, and took into account that the claims were stale, that this was the second missed hearing, that the claimant had delayed until shortly before the hearing to contact the tribunal, that no schedule of loss had been provided, and that it was not apparent why another person could not assist her mother in finding a hospital.
The claimant did not attend the hearing. The judge therefore proceeded in her absence and held that the claims for unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, notice pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay and other payments were not well founded and were dismissed. The tribunal also recorded that, in the claimant's absence, it was not satisfied that she had discharged the burden of establishing any of the losses she claimed.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Judgment refers to notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment refers to arrears of pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Judgment refers to unspecified other payments. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- overriding objective
- Presidential Guidance on seeking postponements of hearings
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.