Case 2302242/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Onyejeli v GSM London Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302242/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Onyejeli
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the claim. Instead, by letter dated 11 December 2021, it gave Miss N Onyejeli an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge R Lewis held that the claim should be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records no monetary remedy and no findings on the underlying substantive allegations.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 11 December 2021, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but she did not make written representations or any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.