Case 2302245/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Clive KITCHENER v The Thinking Schools Academy Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302245/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Atkins
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Clive KITCHENER
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London South hearing on 8 December 2022, Employment Judge Atkins, sitting alone, held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was well founded and succeeded against The Thinking Schools Academy Trust. The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The judgment was a liability decision only. It directed that a remedy hearing be listed for 17 March 2023, to take place by CVP, and ordered the parties to agree and file a supplementary bundle containing any new information they wished to rely on by 24 February 2023. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability judgment only. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded and listed a remedy hearing for 17 March 2023. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.