Case 2302247/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mrs M Dabke — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302247/2019
- Decision date
- 29 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Preliminary
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 29 November 2019 before Employment Judge K Andrews at London South Employment Tribunal, the tribunal recorded claims by Miss T Spinelli against Mrs M Dabke for unfair dismissal, unpaid notice pay, unpaid wages and unpaid holiday. The written judgment states that all of those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The record does not set out any findings on the merits of the claims. It records only that the dismissal followed withdrawal, and no monetary award was made. The note at the end of the judgment says reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Mapped from the judgment's reference to 'unpaid notice pay'; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Mapped from the judgment's reference to 'unpaid holiday'; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.