Case 2302248/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Bassett v Lush by Design Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302248/2018
- Decision date
- 13 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Bassett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 20 October 2020, the Tribunal gave Miss C Bassett an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, about why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that she did not make any representations in writing or otherwise, and did not request a hearing to consider the issue.
On that basis, Employment Judge Webster struck out the claim on 13 July 2021. The judgment does not record any determination on the substantive merits of the underlying claim heads, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment itself only states that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued. This claim head is taken from the GOV.UK listing for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment itself only states that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued. This claim head is taken from the GOV.UK listing for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.