Case 2302249/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Dilworth v City Sprint — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302249/2021
- Decision date
- 14 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Dilworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 after no response had been entered by the respondent, City Sprint. On that basis, the tribunal stated that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal and race discrimination succeed. The judgment does not set out further factual findings on liability beyond the Rule 21 default basis.
The tribunal did not determine remedy in this judgment. It recorded that the remedy to which Mr Z Dilworth is entitled will be decided at a separate remedy hearing on a date to be advised. The respondent was permitted to participate in that hearing only at the discretion of the Judge.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Succeeded under Rule 21 because the respondent entered no response. | Upheld | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Succeeded under Rule 21 because the respondent entered no response. | Upheld | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.