Case 2302254/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr l Chittock v Jonathan Bushnell/LIFElabs.io Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302254/2019
- Decision date
- 14 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr l Chittock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim in an order dated 14 December 2022. The reason recorded was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal had written to the claimant on 16 November 2022 and gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons note that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
No merits findings were made and no remedy was recorded. The extracted text does not identify the underlying claim type(s) beyond the general reference to 'the claim'.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment records only that 'the claim' was struck out for not having been actively pursued. By a letter dated 16 November 2022, the tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing on strike-out, but the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The extracted text does not specify the underlying claim type(s). | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.