Case 2302259/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Stevie Seaton v Sami Husseyin — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302259/2021
- Decision date
- 31 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dyal Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Stevie Seaton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss Stevie Seaton had been discriminated against because of pregnancy and pregnancy-related illness, contrary to s.18 and s.39 Equality Act 2010. It awarded £25,826.44 on that claim, made up of past loss of earnings, interest on past loss, future loss, injury to feelings, and interest on injury to feelings.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed, but stated that no further financial award was made for that claim. In addition, it found that the claimant had 11.64 days of accrued holiday on termination and ordered payment of £841.69 for holiday pay.
The claimant's notice pay claim failed because the tribunal found she had been paid notice pay. The total sum the respondent was ordered to pay was £26,668.13.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal found discrimination because of pregnancy and pregnancy-related illness contrary to s.18 Equality Act 2010 and s.39 Equality Act 2010. The award of £25,826.44 was itemised as past loss of earnings, interest on past loss, future loss, injury to feelings, and interest on injury to feelings. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £25,826 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed, but recorded that no further financial award was made on that claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had 11.64 days of accrued holiday upon termination and awarded £841.69 compensation. | Upheld | — | £842 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claim for notice pay failed because the tribunal found the claimant had been paid notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,668
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £13,497
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.18 Equality Act 2010
- s.39 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.