Case 2302264/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Ali v Beap Restaurants Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302264/2022
- Decision date
- 10 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 29 August 2024, the Tribunal ordered Mr R Ali to write to the Respondent, with a copy to the Tribunal, setting out how he proposed to comply with his outstanding obligations under the Unless Order on or before 5 September 2024. The judgment records that he did not comply with that order.
The Tribunal therefore issued judgment under Rule 38 striking out the claims for non-compliance with the Unless Order dated 29 August 2024. No liability findings were made on the substance of the claims.
The hearing listed for 14-17 October 2024 was vacated. The judgment is signed by Acting Regional Employment Judge Khalil on 10 September 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claims were struck out under Rule 38 for non-compliance with the Tribunal’s Unless Order dated 29 August 2024. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The claims were struck out under Rule 38 for non-compliance with the Tribunal’s Unless Order dated 29 August 2024. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claims were struck out under Rule 38 for non-compliance with the Tribunal’s Unless Order dated 29 August 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.