Case 2302268/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A El-Sayegh v The Charter Schools Education Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302268/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A El-Sayegh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Croydon by CVP on 9 January 2024 before Employment Judge Leith, with Mr Lawson appearing for the claimant and Mr Starcevic for the respondent. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal’s recorded judgment was confined to the claimant’s disability status. It found that Ms A El-Sayegh did not have a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times, relying on the conditions described as anxiety/panic attacks and PTSD.
No further substantive findings, liability conclusions, or monetary award are recorded in the written judgment provided. The outcome reflected on the record is therefore that the disability issue was resolved against the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment determined a preliminary issue only: the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times by reason of anxiety/panic attacks and PTSD. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.