Case 2302269/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Sibanda v NRS Recruitment Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302269/2018
- Decision date
- 13 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Ashford
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Sibanda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim by Mr A Sibanda against NRS Recruitment Services Limited was listed for hearing at Ashford on 13 September 2019 before Employment Judge Corrigan sitting alone. Neither party attended, and the respondent had entered no response. The judgment states that, because neither party was present, the claimant's claim was dismissed.
In the reasons, the tribunal recorded that the clerk's attempt to contact the claimant was unsuccessful and that no application to postpone had been received. The tribunal also noted that the claimant had last heard from the tribunal on 28 August 2018 and had not replied to correspondence dated 6 December 2018 seeking information to enable a judgment without a hearing. The tribunal therefore concluded that it appeared he was no longer actively pursuing the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal dismissed the claim because neither party attended the hearing. The reasons note that no postponement application had been received, the clerk's attempt to contact the claimant was unsuccessful, and the claimant had not replied to correspondence requesting information for a judgment without a hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.