Case 2302271/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Steven Riche v Fourshore (HOT) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302271/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Steven Riche
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Acting Regional Employment Judge Davies. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,513.07.
The tribunal also awarded damages for breach of contract in two separate respects: £2,333.33 for failure to give proper notice of termination of employment, and £110.98 for failure to reimburse expenses. The judgment does not record any reduction, apportionment, or additional remedy beyond those sums. The total award was £3,957.38.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,513.07. | Upheld | — | £1,513 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for breach of contract arising from failure to give proper notice of termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,333 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for breach of contract arising from failure to reimburse expenses. | Upheld | — | £111 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,957
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.