Case 2302272/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Ms Carter – Counsel — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302272/2019
- Decision date
- 30 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Robson was employed by South Eastern Railway Ltd as a Platform Manager from 1 December 2008 until 11 April 2019, when he was dismissed for gross misconduct. The incident arose on 5 March 2019, when he approached DO to check whether DO was wearing safety shoes; the tribunal recorded that the claimant admitted he stamped on DO's foot, and the incident was captured on CCTV.
The tribunal heard evidence from Mr Musonda, who investigated the matter, and Mr Hackett, who chaired the disciplinary hearing. It found that the respondent viewed the CCTV, interviewed the claimant and DO, and followed a disciplinary process that was in accordance with its policy and ACAS guidance. Applying section 98(4) ERA 1996 and British Home Stores v Burchell, the tribunal held that the respondent had a genuine belief on reasonable grounds that the claimant had committed misconduct and that the investigation was reasonable.
The tribunal also found that the dismissal decision fell within the band of reasonable responses. It accepted that the claimant had been given full opportunity to put his case at the disciplinary and appeal stages, that the third point of contact showed excessive force, and that the respondent was entitled to conclude that summary dismissal was justified even without previous disciplinary matters. On the balance of probabilities, the tribunal found that the claimant had committed the act for which he was dismissed and that the respondent was entitled to dismiss without notice, so the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims were dismissed.
The judgment's final disposition also dismisses the holiday pay and unauthorised deductions from wages claims. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the respondent had a conduct reason, carried out a reasonable investigation, and had a genuine belief on reasonable grounds that the claimant was guilty of gross misconduct. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that the claimant committed the act for which he was dismissed and was entitled to be dismissed without notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The dispositive paragraph dismisses holiday pay as part of the grouped claims; the reasons do not separately analyse this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The dispositive paragraph dismisses unauthorised deductions from wages as part of the grouped claims; the reasons do not separately analyse this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores v Burchell [1980] ICR 303
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.