Case 2302285/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Cristina Garcia Gonzales v Green Cave Daycare Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302285/2021
- Decision date
- 20 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Carney Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Cristina Garcia Gonzales
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms Cristina Garcia Gonzales, brought a holiday pay complaint against Green Cave Daycare Limited. At the hearing before Employment Judge Carney on 16 June 2022, the tribunal found that her complaint that she had not been paid for holiday she had accrued but not taken in the holiday year in which her employment terminated was well founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £777.78 gross in respect of 2.3 weeks’ holiday entitlement. The judgment states that the sum is subject to any applicable deductions for tax and national insurance contributions. No other claims or remedies are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the claimant’s complaint that she had not been paid for accrued but untaken holiday in the holiday year in which her employment terminated was well founded. The award was stated to be £777.78 gross, representing 2.3 weeks’ holiday entitlement and subject to any applicable deductions for tax and national insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £778 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £778
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.