Case 2302289/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mihai v Eight Holyrood Limited t/a Nine Lives Bar — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302289/2021
- Decision date
- 9 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mihai
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Mr Mihai was a worker for the purposes of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and the Employment Rights Act 1996. It then held that Eight Holyrood Limited t/a Nine Lives Bar was in breach of contract because it dismissed him without notice, and awarded £245.80 in damages for that breach.
The Tribunal also found that the Respondent failed to comply with regulations 13 and 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998 in relation to accrued but unpaid holiday pay. It ordered the Respondent to pay £1,755.01 for that claim.
In addition, the Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £491.60 as additional compensation under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failing to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The total amount awarded was £2,492.41.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found the Respondent breached contract by dismissing the Claimant without notice and awarded damages of £245.80. | Upheld | — | £246 |
| Working time regulations | The Tribunal found a failure to comply with regulations 13 and 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998 in relation to accrued but unpaid holiday pay and ordered payment of £1,755.01. | Upheld | — | £1,755 |
| Other | The Tribunal awarded additional compensation under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £492 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,492
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulations 13 and 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.