Case 2302290/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Grundy v London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Sitting At: London South — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302290/2020
- Decision date
- 23 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morton On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Grundy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing before Employment Judge Morton at London South on 12 to 15 September 2022, Miss S Grundy brought claims against London Ambulance Service NHS Trust including direct sex discrimination, indirect discrimination under s 19 Equality Act 2010, failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss 20 and 21, and victimisation under s 27. The written judgment records that the direct sex discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The tribunal also recorded that the indirect discrimination, reasonable adjustments, and victimisation complaints were not well founded and were dismissed. The written record says that reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the direct sex discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records an indirect discrimination claim under s 19 Equality Act 2010 as not well founded and dismissed. The protected characteristic is not stated in the judgment text; sex is inferred from the case listing's sex discrimination category. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint under s 27 Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s 19 Equality Act 2010
- ss 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- s 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.