Case 2302291/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr P Nainthy (Solicitor). — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302291/2021
- Decision date
- 13 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 13 July 2022, Employment Judge Tegerdine heard from the claimant and the respondent’s representative and decided that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. The only claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal.
The tribunal’s reason was straightforward: the claimant was not employed by Siemens Plc, and so was not entitled to the protection afforded to employees under section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the claim could not proceed. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim because the claimant was not employed by the respondent and was therefore not entitled to the protection of section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.