Case 2302294/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Singh v Bains Logistics Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302294/2020
- Decision date
- 18 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Singh did not attend the CVP hearing on 18 March 2022. Employment Judge Corrigan Ashford sat alone. When the claimant failed to attend, the clerk telephoned him during the hearing but received no answer.
The tribunal also noted that, despite orders for document disclosure and witness statements, no further documentation had been received from the claimant. The last contact the tribunal had from him was 13 August 2021. In light of that non-attendance and the procedural history, the tribunal dismissed the case under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The judgment does not decide the merits of the pleaded breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages claims, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend; the judgment did not determine the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend; the judgment did not determine the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.