Case 2302305/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Lappi v Bridges Logistics and Fulfilment Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302305/2021
- Decision date
- 20 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Lappi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the South London Employment Tribunals on 30 June 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Wright decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the merits recorded in the judgment, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The respondent was therefore ordered to pay the claimant £576.92.
The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any payment owed to HMRC in respect of tax or National Insurance contributions. The judgment records a total award of £576.92 and does not allocate that sum between separate heads of loss.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £577 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £577
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.