Case 2302312/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Knell v Shearings Holiday Ltd (In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302312/2020
- Decision date
- 10 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Knell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent under Rule 64. The tribunal recorded that permission for the claims to proceed against the respondent, and the lifting of the moratorium, was granted by the administrators of the first respondent.
The tribunal found that Mrs E Knell was employed by the first respondent and was dismissed on 22 May 2020 by reason of redundancy. It further found that the respondent failed to adequately comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
On that basis, the claimant's claim for a protective award under section 189 of the 1992 Act succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment to the claimant for a protected period of 60 days beginning on 22 May 2020, stated that the Recoupment Regulations apply to the award, stayed all further proceedings in the action, and made no order as to costs.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under section 189 TULRCA 1992 succeeded after the tribunal found non-compliance with section 188 TULRCA 1992. The judgment ordered remuneration for a protected period of 60 days beginning on 22 May 2020, but no pound amount was stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 64
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.