Case 2302314/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Patel v DPD Group UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302314/2020
- Decision date
- 1 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Patel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter at London South by CVP on 1 December 2022 before Employment Judge Wright. The judgment records that the respondent applied to strike out the claim as having no reasonable prospect of success under Rule 37(1)(a).
The tribunal granted the respondent's application and struck out the claim. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing identifies Unfair Dismissal. The judgment itself records that the respondent's application to strike out the claim under Rule 37(1)(a) succeeded because the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing identifies Working Time Regulations. The judgment itself records that the respondent's application to strike out the claim under Rule 37(1)(a) succeeded because the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.