Case 2302322/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. T. Jackson v Swiss Re Management Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302322/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Representation
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. T. Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was listed as an unfair dismissal case brought by Mr T. Jackson against Swiss Re Management Limited. At a CVP hearing on 4 December 2020 before Employment Judge Sage, the tribunal considered compliance with an unless order sent on 10 January 2020 requiring the Claimant to provide details of why he said his dismissal was unfair by 24 January 2020.
The tribunal found that the Claimant provided the required details to the Tribunal but not to the Respondent. It held that he had therefore failed to comply with the unless order.
As a result, the tribunal recorded that the claim stood as dismissed on 24 January 2020. The hearing listed for 10 December 2020 was vacated. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was not determined on the merits. The tribunal recorded that the Claimant complied with the unless order by sending details to the Tribunal but not to the Respondent, and held that he therefore failed to comply with the order. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.