Mrs S Khalat v Interclad Facades Ltd — 2023

Case reference: 2302328/2019
Decision date: 23 May 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ferguson Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs S Khalat

Respondent

Interclad Facades Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment is an administrative disposal of the remaining claim in a pair of materially identical proceedings brought by Mrs S Khalat against Interclad Facades Ltd. It states that one of the two claims had already been disposed of in full by a Rule 21 judgment in case 2303968/2019, and that the present claim, 2302328/2019, had not been disposed of because of an oversight.

No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or factual dispute are set out in the text provided. The tribunal’s operative order is simply that the claim is dismissed.

Because the judgment does not identify the underlying complaint, the specific claim type cannot be confirmed from the text alone. No award or legal test is recorded in this decision.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action. It records that the claimant had brought two materially identical claims, that one was already disposed of in full under Rule 21 in case 2303968/2019, and that this remaining claim had not been disposed of because of an oversight.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.