Case 2302340/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Parsons v Alpha Schools (Holdings) Ltd (“R1”) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302340/2022
- Decision date
- 21 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Klimov
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs B Parsons
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs B Parsons’s claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal (notice pay), and failure to pay for accrued but untaken holiday were all well founded and succeeded. The judgment identifies the respondents as Alpha Schools (Holdings) Ltd and Wellesley House School Limited.
The written record does not set out the tribunal’s detailed reasons, but it records that remedy issues arising from those successful claims were to be determined at a remedy hearing on 22 March 2023 if the parties did not agree them. The judgment was sent to the parties on 21 February 2023.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Remedy issues were listed for determination at a remedy hearing on 22 March 2023, if not agreed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Specified in the judgment as wrongful dismissal (notice pay). Remedy issues were listed for determination at a remedy hearing on 22 March 2023, if not agreed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Specified in the judgment as failure to pay for accrued but untaken holiday. Remedy issues were listed for determination at a remedy hearing on 22 March 2023, if not agreed. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.