Case 2302346/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Nyarega v Anchor Hanovergroup — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302346/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Nyarega
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the unfair dismissal complaint in this judgment. By letter dated 21 October 2020, the tribunal gave Ms J Nyarega an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out because she had less than 2 years' continuous employment.
Ms Nyarega did not respond to that letter. At the hearing on 7 July 2021 she confirmed that she had less than 2 years' continuous employment. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims for race discrimination and unpaid holiday pay remained outstanding. It does not determine those claims or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had less than 2 years' continuous employment. The claimant did not respond to the tribunal's 21 October 2020 letter inviting representations or a request for a hearing, and at the hearing confirmed that she had less than 2 years' continuous employment. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.