Case 2302348/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Trevor Mendez v Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302348/2022
- Decision date
- 3 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mrs N Beeston, Mrs A Williams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Trevor Mendez
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at London South Employment Tribunal, Croydon on 1-3 November 2023 before Employment Judge Abbott, Mrs N Beeston and Mrs A Williams. The claimant, Mr Trevor Mendez, brought complaints of constructive unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages, and disability discrimination.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The complaint was pleaded as constructive unfair dismissal and was dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deductions from wages complaint was dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination complaints, including direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments, were dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.